Passive Vs Active Investing: Which is Best For You

Choosing the right investing strategy is crucial for long-term success.

Two strategies that spark debate amongst investors are active investing and passive investing.

While both have their pros and cons, there’s going to be some people who prefer laid back, and others who prefer hands on.

Let’s discuss the benefits and drawbacks of both, so you can decide which is best for you.

Benefits of Active Investing

Active investing involves managing investments on a regular basis. This is with the goal of outperforming the market.

Active investors rely on…

• Research

• Analysis

• Their own judgement

…to make decisions with the hope of putting themselves ahead of passive investors.

Active investors buy and sell…

• Stocks

• ETFs

• Real Estate

• Other assets

…with the belief that they can identify opportunities to generate higher returns.

The core difference is that passive investors are only investing their money.

Active investors are also investing their time.

Do you have the time to invest into learning new skills with regards to investing?

Potential for Higher Returns

Active investors believe that they can generate higher returns than the market.

They can uncover opportunities that can outperform the broader market.

This is true when you consider that the majority of investors are in the passive “buy and hold” mode, which is my preferred route.

Flexibility and Control

Active investors have the flexibility to make decisions based on their own research.

They can adjust their:

• Portfolio allocation

• Asset selection

• Timing of buying and selling

Based on their:

• Outlook

• Philosophy/Knowledge

• Risk tolerance

Giving them a sense of control.

It can give a sense of fulfilment if you ever get to a point where you’re skilled enough to beat the market consistently.

Ability to Adapt to Changing Market Conditions

Active investors can respond to changing market conditions by adjusting their strategies.

They can:

• Capitalise on short-term market fluctuations

• Adjust their portfolio allocation based on their market outlook (interest rates etc.)

• Manage risks

Which they believe can help them navigate market volatility and optimise their returns.

Drawbacks of Active Investing

There are also a handful of negatives which you must consider before you start investing:

Higher Costs

Active investing comes with higher costs compared to passive investing.

Frequent trading results in higher transaction costs, such as trading commissions.

Also, managed funds have higher fees compared to passive index funds or ETFs.

The severity of this point is reliant on how skilled you are at beating the market.

If your returns exceed the market returns and your extra fees, it’s worth it.

Higher Risk

Attempts to beat the market can lead to higher risk and potential losses.

Market timing isn’t easy. Active investors may experience under performance during periods of volatility.

Active investing also requires more time, effort, and expertise. This may not be suitable for all investors.

There’s no guarantee that the time you put in will pay off. The opportunity cost in relation to investing time, can be significant.

Lack of Consistency

Consistently outperforming the market over the long term can be difficult.

Studies show that actively managed funds often fail to outperform their benchmark index over the long term.

The performance of managed funds can be influenced by various factors, including:

• Market conditions

• Economic events (inflation, changing interest rates etc.)

• Fund manager’s decisions

Making it difficult to predict and achieve consistent out performance.

Benefits of Passive Investing

Passive investing is where investors aim to match the performance of the market.

Passive investors buy low-cost ETFs that track a specific index, whilst spending their time elsewhere.

Like reading educational books or starting a side hustle.

The idea is to hold a diversified portfolio that mirrors the market, rather than trying to beat it.

By doing this, you can spend your time on other areas of wealth building, like increasing your income, to then be able to invest more.

This is my preferred approach.

I find that it’s too risky of a venture to dive into. My time can be better used elsewhere, like writing blog posts for you wonderful people.

Lower Costs

Passive investing involves lower costs compared to active investing.

Index funds and ETFs have lower fees, as they don’t need active management or frequent trading.

Lower costs can have a big impact on long term investment returns.

Plus, any transaction fees will be way less, because you’re making less transactions.

Consistency

Passive investing offers consistent performance in line with the market.

This eliminates the need for frequent trading or trying to time the market. This reduces the impact of short-term market fluctuations.

Over the long term, passive investing can provide stable and predictable returns.

Since WWII, the S&P 500 has returned around 10% annually.

Do you think that you can beat this by trying to time the market?

Simplicity

Passive investing is easy to understand.

Investors don’t need to spend extensive time on research to make frequent decisions.

This approach is suitable for those who prefer a hands-off approach. Or, don’t have the expertise or time for active management.

Drawbacks of Passive Investing

Despite the benefits of a more passive approach, you have to consider the negatives that come with it:

Limited Potential for Outperformance

Passive investors aim to match the performance of the market. This means they may miss out on opportunities to outperform the market.

They can’t take advantage of undervalued assets, or capitalise on short-term gains.

Exposure to Market Risks

Passive investors are still exposed to market risks, including downturns and volatility.

Since the portfolio mirrors the market, it may experience declines.

But, diversification across different asset classes and sectors can help mitigate risks.

This is why I’m a strong advocate for a long term mindset when it comes to investing.

Lack of Flexibility

Passive investing involves a buy-and-hold approach. This means investors aren’t able to take advantage of short-term opportunities.

This approach may not be suitable for investors who prefer a more active or dynamic strategy.

Final Thoughts

The active vs. passive investing debate is a common discussion among investors.

Both approaches have their pros and cons, and the right strategy depends on your own:

• Preferences

• Goals

• Risk tolerance

• Time horizon

Active investing offers:

• Potential for higher returns

• Flexibility

• Control

But it comes with:

• Higher costs

• Risks

• Lack of consistency

On the other hand, passive investing offers:

• Lower costs

• Diversification

• Consistency

• Simplicity

But may have:

• Limited potential for out performance

• Lack of flexibility

We’re not in any position to be telling you what strategy you should/shouldn’t be doing. You simply have a choice:

• Timing the market.

• Time in the market.

Me?

I’m in it for the long run, so I’ll always choose the latter.

Thanks for reading! Be sure to subscribe (it’s free!) for more financial wisdom every week.